Kongresowy Indywidualny 315: G Cieślak | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | P Wiankowski-B Jacuch,R Marks-* | 10 | WE | 3 | W | 2 | = | +110 | 86.95% | 86.95% | ||
P Wiankowski-R Marks,*-B Jacuch | 11 | WE | 3 | E | 7 | = | +400 | 93.10% | 90.03% | |||
P Wiankowski-*,B Jacuch-R Marks | 12 | NS | 3 | N | J | -1 | -100 | 15.52% | 65.19% | |||
2 | D Krakowiak-P Dybicz,E Orłowska-* | 22 | WE | 2 | N | 5 | = | -90 | 58.62% | 63.55% | ||
D Krakowiak-E Orłowska,*-P Dybicz | 23 | WE | 3 | S | A | = | -110 | 72.41% | 65.32% | |||
D Krakowiak-*,P Dybicz-E Orłowska | 24 | NS | 1 | E | Q | +1 | -120 | 72.41% | 66.50% | |||
3 | J Wawrowski-W Piątek,P Marcinowski-* | 1 | WE | 2 | W | A | +2 | +170 | 89.66% | 69.81% | ||
J Wawrowski-P Marcinowski,*-W Piątek | 2 | WE | 3 | W | 10 | -4 | -200 | 10.34% | 62.38% | |||
J Wawrowski-*,W Piątek-P Marcinowski | 3 | NS | 3 | N | A | -2 | -100 | 5.17% | 56.02% | |||
4 | K Grzeszkowiak-S Cieślak,M Dobrowolski-* | 13 | WE | 4 | S | 4 | = | -130 | 44.83% | 54.90% | ||
K Grzeszkowiak-M Dobrowolski,*-S Cieślak | 14 | WE | 2 | E | A | +1 | +140 | 70.69% | 56.34% | |||
K Grzeszkowiak-*,S Cieślak-M Dobrowolski | 15 | NS | 4× | S | A | -2 | -500 | 10.34% | 52.50% | |||
5 | W Wajda-S Czech,V Valchev-* | 25 | WE | 4× | N | 2 | = | -590 | 5.17% | 48.86% | ||
W Wajda-V Valchev,*-S Czech | 26 | WE | 4 | W | Q | -1 | -100 | 50.00% | 48.94% | |||
W Wajda-*,S Czech-V Valchev | 27 | NS | 4× | N | 7 | -1 | -100 | 15.52% | 46.72% | |||
6 | A Wódkowski-J Chodorowski,A Rybak-* | 4 | WE | 2 | E | 4 | = | +90 | 55.17% | 47.24% | ||
A Wódkowski-A Rybak,*-J Chodorowski | 5 | WE | 2 | W | K | = | +110 | 37.93% | 46.70% | |||
A Wódkowski-*,J Chodorowski-A Rybak | 6 | NS | 6 | E | A | = | -1430 | 55.17% | 47.17% | |||
7 | H Borewicz-P Guzik,M Kubicki-* | 16 | WE | 3 | E | 2 | -1 | -100 | 24.14% | 45.96% | ||
H Borewicz-M Kubicki,*-P Guzik | 17 | WE | 4 | N | K | +1 | -150 | 25.86% | 44.95% | |||
H Borewicz-*,P Guzik-M Kubicki | 18 | NS | 3 | W | A | -1 | +50 | 77.59% | 46.50% | |||
8 | G Superson-*,J Kuhn-W Skubisz | 28 | NS | 3 | N | 2 | +1 | +170 | 82.10% | 48.12% | ||
*-W Skubisz,J Kuhn-G Superson | 29 | NS | 4 | N | 6 | +1 | +650 | 58.62% | 48.58% | |||
W Skubisz-G Superson,J Kuhn-* | 30 | WE | 2 | S | Q | +2 | -170 | 17.24% | 47.27% | |||
9 | R Bałuk-*,R Nowicki-P Witkowski | 7 | NS | 4 | S | 8 | +1 | +650 | 50.00% | 47.38% | ||
*-P Witkowski,R Nowicki-R Bałuk | 8 | NS | 4 | W | Q | -2 | +100 | 13.79% | 46.09% | |||
P Witkowski-R Bałuk,R Nowicki-* | 9 | WE | 3 | S | Q | -1 | +50 | 79.31% | 47.32% | |||
10 | A Matysek-*,B Szulejewski-S Sierocki | 19 | NS | 5× | N | 9 | -2 | -300 | 24.14% | 46.49% | ||
*-S Sierocki,B Szulejewski-A Matysek | 20 | NS | 4× | E | Q | +2 | -1190 | 0.00% | 44.89% | |||
S Sierocki-A Matysek,B Szulejewski-* | 21 | WE | 3 | N | Q | +1 | -170 | 75.86% | 45.92% | |||
SUMA: | 45.92% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 45.92% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 100 |
Pary.4.1.0.25 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-08-31 o 19:04:31